Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2021 Oct 06
B-cell depletion with obinutuzumab for the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Abstract
Objective
Randomised trials of type I anti-CD20 antibodies rituximab and ocrelizumab failed to show benefit in proliferative lupus nephritis (LN). We compared obinutuzumab, a humanised type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that induces potent B-cell depletion, with placebo for the treatment of LN in combination with standard therapies.
Methods
Patients with LN receiving mycophenolate and corticosteroids were randomised to obinutuzumab 1000 mg or placebo on day 1 and weeks 2, 24 and 26, and followed through week 104. The primary endpoint was complete renal response (CRR) at week 52. Exploratory analyses through week 104 were conducted. The prespecified alpha level was 0.2.
Results
A total of 125 patients were randomised and received blinded infusions. Achievement of CRR was greater with obinutuzumab at week 52 (primary endpoint, 22 (35%) vs 14 (23%) with placebo; percentage difference, 12% (95% CI -3.4% to 28%), p=0.115) and at week 104 (26 (41%) vs 14 (23%); percentage difference, 19% (95% CI 2.7% to 35%), p=0.026). Improvements in other renal response measures, serologies, estimated glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria were greater with obinutuzumab. Obinutuzumab was not associated with increases in serious adverse events, serious infections or deaths. Non-serious infusion-related reactions occurred more frequently with obinutuzumab.
Conclusions
Improved renal responses through week 104 were observed in patients with LN who received obinutuzumab plus standard therapies compared with standard therapies alone. Obinutuzumab was well tolerated and no new safety signals were identified.
Trial registration number
NCT02550652.
Related Questions
Would you consider combining voclosporin and obinutuzumab for pure Class V lupus nephritis?
I agree with @Dr. First Last. Changing his regimen is indicated since target proteinuria (<700 mg/day by 1 year) has not been achieved, and renal biopsy shows ongoing active inflammatory class V (very smart to get that biopsy, by the way!).Obinituzumab (OBI) is the better choice than belimumab in pa...
What do you feel are the potential barriers to widespread use of obinutuzumab in proliferative lupus nephritis?
1. Insurance Coverage: Oh, easy one! Since it is not FDA-approved yet for lupus nephritis (I bet it will be though... great data so far), insurance will unlikely cover it, except for a few (like Tricare, which is sometimes easier to get off-label drugs). I am fortunate to have the NIH Lupus Center c...
What is your approach to dosing and duration of rituximab for refractory lupus nephritis not responsive to cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate?
FirstThe question specifically states "not responsive." It would be highly improbable not to have some improvement with these therapies in conjunction with using hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), steroids, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in an adherent patient.Wha...
In the treatment of lupus nephritis, which patients may benefit from the use of rituximab or other B-cell depleting agents during induction?
I agree with @Dr. @Dr. First Last's previous answer (posted July 2020). In addition, the 2024 ACR Lupus Nephritis guidelines (discussed at the 2024 ACR meeting) still recommend mycophenolate (MMF) or cyclophosphamide as first-line induction therapies for lupus nephritis (LN), rather than B-cell depl...