International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 2014-12-01
Local control and toxicity in a large cohort of central lung tumors treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy.
Abstract
Purpose
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in central lung tumors has been associated with higher rates of severe toxicity. We sought to evaluate toxicity and local control in a large cohort and to identify predictive dosimetric parameters.
Methods and materials
We identified patients who received SBRT for central tumors according to either of 2 definitions. Local failure (LF) was estimated using a competing risks model, and multivariate analysis (MVA) was used to assess factors associated with LF. We reviewed patient toxicity and applied Cox proportional hazard analysis and log-rank tests to assess whether dose-volume metrics of normal structures correlated with pulmonary toxicity.
Results
One hundred twenty-five patients received SBRT for non-small cell lung cancer (n=103) or metastatic lesions (n=22), using intensity modulated radiation therapy. The most common dose was 45 Gy in 5 fractions. Median follow-up was 17.4 months. Incidence of toxicity ≥ grade 3 was 8.0%, including 5.6% pulmonary toxicity. Sixteen patients (12.8%) experienced esophageal toxicity ≥ grade 2, including 50% of patients in whom PTV overlapped the esophagus. There were 2 treatment-related deaths. Among patients receiving biologically effective dose (BED) ≥80 Gy (n=108), 2-year LF was 21%. On MVA, gross tumor volume (GTV) was significantly associated with LF. None of the studied dose-volume metrics of the lungs, heart, proximal bronchial tree (PBT), or 2 cm expansion of the PBT ("no-fly-zone" [NFZ]) correlated with pulmonary toxicity ≥grade 2. There were no differences in pulmonary toxicity between central tumors located inside the NFZ and those outside the NFZ but with planning target volume (PTV) intersecting the mediastinum.
Conclusions
Using moderate doses, SBRT for central lung tumors achieves acceptable local control with low rates of severe toxicity. Dosimetric analysis showed no significant correlation between dose to the lungs, heart, or NFZ and severe pulmonary toxicity. Esophageal toxicity may be an underappreciated risk, particularly when PTV overlaps the esophagus.
Related Questions
Is is okay to offer SBRT for central lung tumors in direct contact with the esophagus?
My short answer is: probably not, if you are considering standard regimens like 10Gy x 5. The risk of fistula appears to be significant if you expose the esophagus to full prescription dose. My group described two patients receiving lung SBRT who developed significant esophageal complications (fistu...
What is an acceptable distance between tumor and heart or aorta to treat a non-small cell lung cancer with SBRT?
I will echo @Dr. First Last's answer. Having used 50 Gy in 5 fractions now for over 10 years at the Cleveland Clinic, we have not identified cardiac or great vessel specific toxicities for the close to 400 patients we have treated with this schedule. Specifically in compiling our data registry, we h...