Mednet Logo

Abstract

Purpose

R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) is standard care for aggressive B-cell lymphoma. A prospective trial was conducted to investigate the role of additive radiotherapy (RT) to bulky and extralymphatic disease.

Patients and methods

The best arm of the RICOVER-60 trial (6×R-CHOP-14+2R [R-CHOP administered once every 2 weeks plus two additional applications of rituximab] plus involved-field RT [36 Gy] to sites of initial bulky [≥ 7.5 cm] disease and extralymphatic involvement) was compared with a cohort receiving the same immunochemotherapy but without RT in an amendment to the RICOVER-60 trial (RICOVER-noRTh) in a prospective fashion.

Results

After a median observation time of 39 months, 164 of 166 RICOVER-noRTh patients were evaluable. In a multivariable analysis of the intention-to-treat population adjusting for International Prognostic Index risk factors and age (> 70 years), event-free survival (EFS) of patients with bulky disease was inferior without additive RT (hazard ratio [HR], 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.5; P = .005), with trends for inferior progression-free (PFS; HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.0 to 3.3; P = .058) and overall survival (OS; HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 0.9 to 3.1; P = .127). In a per-protocol analysis with 11 patients in RICOVER-noRTh excluded for receiving unplanned RT, multivariable analysis revealed HRs of 2.7 (95% CI, 1.3 to 5.9; P = .011) for EFS, 4.4 (95% CI, 1.8 to 10.6; P = .001) for PFS, and 4.3 (95% CI, 1.7 to 11.1; P = .002) for OS for patients not receiving RT to bulky disease.

Conclusion

Additive RT to bulky sites abrogates bulky disease as a risk factor and improves outcome of elderly patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma. Whether RT can be spared in patients with (metabolic) complete remission after immunochemotherapy must be addressed in appropriately designed prospective trials.

Related Questions

When consolidating DLBCL with radiotherapy, do you treat all originally involved sites, or just initially bulky and partial responder sites?

1
1 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · University Hospital Basel

When consolidating DLBCL with radiotherapy, several parameters must be taken into consideration. a) Is radiation therapy part of the treatment plan "on top" of full systemic treatment because of a certain risk situation due to not-optimal response of disease to systemic treatment (for example, FDG-a...

How would you define bulky involvement of the tonsil in a patient with DLBCL?

1 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Duke University Medical Center

While the definition of "bulky" disease has been relatively consistent in the Hodgkin literature, the definition in prospective DLBCL trials has not. For example... ECOG 1484 - 10 cm SWOG 8736 & SWOG 0014 - 10 cm GELA 93-1 & 93-4 - 10 cm RICOVER-60 & RICOVER-noRTh - 7.5 cm UNFOLDER - 7.5 cm OPTIMAL>...

Would you recommend consolidative RT for an HIV-positive patient with Stage I bulky DLBCL of the mediastinum s/p R-EPOCH?

1
1 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · University of Cincinnati

The simple answer is that for most bulky limited-stage DLBCLs, I would favor consolidation ISRT (Preferred per UpToDate and +/- per NCCN). Some support for consolidation RT for bulky DLBCL after modern regimens incorporating rituximab comes from the following: A comparison of patients not receiving ...

When do you recommend consolidative XRT for patients with advanced stage (III-IV) DLBCL who achieve CR to chemoimmunotherapy?

8
2 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Radiation Oncology · Duke University Medical Center

The cornerstone of therapy for advanced DLBCL is chemoimmunotherapy (R-CHOP). Efforts to improve upon this with systemic therapy have been largely unsuccessful (dose-dense chemotherapy, maintenance R, more intensive chemotherapy, high-dose chemotherapy and autologous SCT, etc.). There are increasing...