Mednet Logo

Abstract

Background

Sotorasib showed anticancer activity in patients with KRAS p.G12C-mutated advanced solid tumors in a phase 1 study, and particularly promising anticancer activity was observed in a subgroup of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

In a single-group, phase 2 trial, we investigated the activity of sotorasib, administered orally at a dose of 960 mg once daily, in patients with KRAS p.G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC previously treated with standard therapies. The primary end point was objective response (complete or partial response) according to independent central review. Key secondary end points included duration of response, disease control (defined as complete response, partial response, or stable disease), progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Exploratory biomarkers were evaluated for their association with response to sotorasib therapy.

Results

Among the 126 enrolled patients, the majority (81.0%) had previously received both platinum-based chemotherapy and inhibitors of programmed death 1 (PD-1) or programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). According to central review, 124 patients had measurable disease at baseline and were evaluated for response. An objective response was observed in 46 patients (37.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 28.6 to 46.2), including in 4 (3.2%) who had a complete response and in 42 (33.9%) who had a partial response. The median duration of response was 11.1 months (95% CI, 6.9 to could not be evaluated). Disease control occurred in 100 patients (80.6%; 95% CI, 72.6 to 87.2). The median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (95% CI, 5.1 to 8.2), and the median overall survival was 12.5 months (95% CI, 10.0 to could not be evaluated). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 88 of 126 patients (69.8%), including grade 3 events in 25 patients (19.8%) and a grade 4 event in 1 (0.8%). Responses were observed in subgroups defined according to PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, and co-occurring mutations in STK11, KEAP1, or TP53.

Conclusions

In this phase 2 trial, sotorasib therapy led to a durable clinical benefit without new safety signals in patients with previously treated KRAS p.G12C-mutated NSCLC. (Funded by Amgen and the National Institutes of Health; CodeBreaK100 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03600883.).

Related Questions

What are your top takeaways in Thoracic Cancers from ASCO 2023?

1
5 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · Albert Einstein College of Medicine at Montefiore Medical Center

Always so hard to pick a top 3 as luckily each ASCO provides us with a broad spectrum of significant advances in our field but if pressed against the wall, I might pick below 3: The first is a double dip choice I admit matching ADAURA with KN789. Of course, you need to be living in a cave not to be ...

Would you consider using sotorasib first line in patient with metastatic KRAS G12C NSCLC who declines chemotherapy?

2 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · The Ohio State University School of Medicine

This would be outside the scope of available data and current FDA approval. Both CodeBreaK100 and CodeBreaK 200 (presented at ESMO) included only patients previously treated with either chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or both. I would generally stick to standard first line options for these patients, e...

Is there any evidence that patients with metastatic NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutations benefit less from treatment with immunotherapy?

2
5 Answers

Mednet Member
Mednet Member
Medical Oncology · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

KRAS mutation in NSCLC has been associated with improved response rate and overall survival compared to KRAS wild type NSCLC in meta-analysis of single-agent, second-line trials with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition. Moreover, analysis of patients with KRAS lung adenocarcinoma divided by subsets including co-m...