JAMA 2010-03-17
Stereotactic body radiation therapy for inoperable early stage lung cancer.
Abstract
Context
Patients with early stage but medically inoperable lung cancer have a poor rate of primary tumor control (30%-40%) and a high rate of mortality (3-year survival, 20%-35%) with current management.
Objective
To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy in a high-risk population of patients with early stage but medically inoperable lung cancer.
Design, setting, and patients
Phase 2 North American multicenter study of patients aged 18 years or older with biopsy-proven peripheral T1-T2N0M0 non-small cell tumors (measuring <5 cm in diameter) and medical conditions precluding surgical treatment. The prescription dose was 18 Gy per fraction x 3 fractions (54 Gy total) with entire treatment lasting between 1(1/2) and 2 weeks. The study opened May 26, 2004, and closed October 13, 2006; data were analyzed through August 31, 2009.
Main outcome measures
The primary end point was 2-year actuarial primary tumor control; secondary end points were disease-free survival (ie, primary tumor, involved lobe, regional, and disseminated recurrence), treatment-related toxicity, and overall survival.
Results
A total of 59 patients accrued, of which 55 were evaluable (44 patients with T1 tumors and 11 patients with T2 tumors) with a median follow-up of 34.4 months (range, 4.8-49.9 months). Only 1 patient had a primary tumor failure; the estimated 3-year primary tumor control rate was 97.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.3%-99.7%). Three patients had recurrence within the involved lobe; the 3-year primary tumor and involved lobe (local) control rate was 90.6% (95% CI, 76.0%-96.5%). Two patients experienced regional failure; the local-regional control rate was 87.2% (95% CI, 71.0%-94.7%). Eleven patients experienced disseminated recurrence; the 3-year rate of disseminated failure was 22.1% (95% CI, 12.3%-37.8%). The rates for disease-free survival and overall survival at 3 years were 48.3% (95% CI, 34.4%-60.8%) and 55.8% (95% CI, 41.6%-67.9%), respectively. The median overall survival was 48.1 months (95% CI, 29.6 months to not reached). Protocol-specified treatment-related grade 3 adverse events were reported in 7 patients (12.7%; 95% CI, 9.6%-15.8%); grade 4 adverse events were reported in 2 patients (3.6%; 95% CI, 2.7%-4.5%). No grade 5 adverse events were reported.
Conclusion
Patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer who received stereotactic body radiation therapy had a survival rate of 55.8% at 3 years, high rates of local tumor control, and moderate treatment-related morbidity.
Related Questions
Would you treat a NSCLC with a hypofractionated course daily or every other day?
The rationale for every other day dosing dates back decades, but in the SBRT/SABR space was perhaps most clearly demarcated for most of us in the RTOG 0236 protocol. In this study, when delivering 54 Gy/3 it was stated that "A minimum of 40 hours and a maximum of 8 days should separate each treatmen...
How would you approach a patient with acute development of radiation changes around the target while undergoing a course of lung SBRT?
The answer to this question is dependent on the dose/fractionation of lung SBRT being employed. For example, at our institution, we preferentially use single fractions for peripheral lesions and for fractionated central dose schedules such as 50 Gy in 5 fractions, we do not gap the treatments but tr...
Do you have a maximum size cutoff for lung SBRT in central NSCLC?
The bigger the tumor size, the lower the efficacy of SBRT. Typically, I wouldn’t treat lesion of size >7 cm for the following reasons: The local control is lower even with BED>100 Gy; There is high chance that the PTV overlaps with critical structures so toxicities could be high. There is high poss...
What is the clinical significance of R50 in lung SBRT?
Small lesions are the hardest to plan and meet the constraints like the R50%. You are right that those parameters have not been associated with symptomatic pneumonitis. The only reliable predictor in retrospective studies has been increased PTV size. The R50, conformality index, and dose spillage va...
Should lung SBRT fractions be delivered on consecutive days, every other day, or perhaps an even more prolonged schedule?
For North Ameridcan Radiaton Oncologists whose experience with lung SBRT began when they participated in one or both of the RTOG lung SBRT protocols (0236, 0813), they would have quickly learned that their patients would be classified as having either "peripheral" or "central" tumors based on the de...
How were decisions made about what dose constraints to use in the recent RTOG protocols for lung SBRT?
This is a question that is frequently and appropriately asked by SBRT beginners and experienced practitioners. The history of SBRT in that regard replicates much of the historic experience in RT which is that the data generated from treating the patients generated the constraints, so to speak, as op...
Do you use minimum cutoff values for any PFTs below which you would not offer conventionally fractionated chemoradiation or SBRT for NSCLC?
We have historically not used a cut-off lower-limit for FEV1 or DLCO when selecting patients for SBRT for stage I NSCLC. This is supported by both our own (PMID 19487961) and the Indiana University (PMID 18394819) series in which patients were divided into quartiles by baseline PFT's. In both series...