Register
Community
Overview
Experts
Editors
Fellows
Code of conduct
Company
About Us
FAQs
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Careers
Programs
News
News Releases
Press Coverage
Publications
Blog
Contact Us
Sign in
Please select the option that best describes you:
Topics:
Cardiology
•
Cardiovascular Imaging
When would you consider using cardiac MRI over nuclear imaging for functional assessment of ischemic heart disease, since it is class IIa indication in the US but otherwise class I in Europe?
Related Questions
What is your preferred imaging modality for the evaluation of coronary microvascular dysfunction/INOCA and when would you favor it over coronary angiogram with provocative testing?
Would you favor functional or anatomical assessment for CAD in a patient with intermediate CV risk factors with equivocal or nondiagnostic exercise treadmill testing and normal renal function?
What is a reasonable approach to coronary calcification that is incidentally found on CT in a patient who does not have symptoms suggestive of angina?
When would you consider CT aortic valve calcium score over TEE to further delineate the severity of LFLG aortic stenosis?
Would you recommend hospitalization for surgery for a large papillary fibroelastoma or atrial myxoma discovered on an outpatient echocardiogram?
What is the best way to categorize aortic stenosis in normal LV function with normal LV size, when the peak velocity and mean pressure gradient are in moderate range but AVA shows severe?
When do you favor using cardiac CT compared to TEE for outpatient surveillance in the immediate post-Watchman period?
How reliable is an exercise stress echo in the diagnosis of exercise-induced heart failure with preserved ejection fraction?
How do you approach a patient at intermediate ASCVD risk who has been referred to you because of an abnormal coronary CTA (obstructive lesion ~90%) but an excellent exercise capacity on treadmill without angina and a negative MPI?
What are your top takeaways from AHA 2023?
