Would you use different EBRT field edge for an HIV positive patient with FIGO IIIC1 (2018) cervical cancer with positive bilateral external iliac nodes?
Do you cover common iliac nodes (L3/L4) or keep field edge at L4/L5 to reduce bone marrow toxicity?
Answer from: Radiation Oncologist at Community Practice
In any situation I would not favor bony landmark and use anatomical vascular landmarks. This is a review article in Seminars in Radiation Oncology summarizing nodal RT for cervical ca written with North American and European collaboration.
Comments
Radiation Oncologist at University of Kentucky My recommendation would be to get a PET-CT. If ne...
My recommendation would be to get a PET-CT. If ne...