New: NCI-funded clinical trial search
Mednet Logo

How do you utilize lenalidomide maintenance in non-transplant eligible myeloma?

Does the choice of initial induction regimen affect your decision for when to employ lenalidomide maintenance? Are there situations where you would consider stopping therapy for a patient in a VGPR or better? Does MRD testing have a role in this decision-making?
3 Answers
Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · OhioHealth
Answered on · Updated on

Maintenance is a standard of care management for both transplant eligible and transplant ineligible, regardless of type of induction regimen. Studies have shown benefit for both groups. Time to progression (PFS) almost twice as long for both groups with maintenance compared to no maintenance.

- For ...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · Mayo Clinic Rochester
Answered on

This is an important question with very recent potentially practice-changing data.

TLDR: For a patient with standard-risk myeloma who is not tolerating lenalidomide well and/or is keen to get off therapy, 2 years of lenalidomide maintenance is justified and should reflect a new standard of care.

The s...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer

Mednet Member
Mednet MemberInvited Expert
Medical Oncology · Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University
Answered on

First-line treatment for most myeloma patients in the US is 4-drug therapy with CD38Ab+RVd using lower cumulative exposure dosing in more frail patients, based in part on results from IMROZ, CEPHEUS, and BENEFIT trials. These all are expected to generate 80+% 2-year PFS and slightly better than 5-ye...

Join for free or sign in to see the full answer