Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2004-05-01
Abbreviated course of radiation therapy in older patients with glioblastoma multiforme: a prospective randomized clinical trial.   
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE
To prospectively compare standard radiation therapy (RT) with an abbreviated course of RT in older patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).
PATIENTS AND METHODS
One hundred patients with GBM, age 60 years or older, were randomly assigned after surgery to receive either standard RT (60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks) or a shorter course of RT (40 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks). The primary end point was overall survival. The secondary end points were proportionate survival at 6 months, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and corticosteroid requirement. HRQoL was assessed using the Karnofsky performance status (KPS) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br).
RESULTS
All patients had died at the time of analysis. Overall survival times measured from randomization were similar at 5.1 months for standard RT versus 5.6 months for the shorter course (log-rank test, P =.57). The survival probabilities at 6 months were also similar at 44.7% for standard RT versus 41.7% for the shorter course (lower-bound 95% CI, -13.7). KPS scores varied markedly but were not significantly different between the two groups (Wilcoxon test, P =.63). Low completion rates of the FACT-Br (45%) precluded meaningful comparisons between the two groups. Of patients completing RT as planned, 49% of patients (standard RT) versus 23% required an increase in posttreatment corticosteroid dosage (chi(2) test, P =.02).
CONCLUSION
There is no difference in survival between patients receiving standard RT or short-course RT. In view of the similar KPS scores, decreased increment in corticosteroid requirement, and reduced treatment time, the abbreviated course of RT seems to be a reasonable treatment option for older patients with GBM.

Related Questions


Our neurosurgeons have been pushing for definitive and postop SRS in patients with a poor performance status. Should I consider this or is it tot...

The recent Roa trial (JCO 9/21/15) found that 25Gy/5fx was non-inferior to 40Gy/5fx in terms of OS, PFS, and QOL. Is 25Gy in 5 daily fractio...

Does the MGMT status change your decision-making? Should we be routinely testing MGMT for elderly patients?

Do you have a volume cutoff in which you would prefer a more fractionated approach?   Additionally, do you routinely add concurrent temozolomid...

Is there any data to suggest higher risk of malignant transformation with hypofractionation? Does concurrent Temozolomide change your approach?