International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 2006-06-01
Comparison of ultrasound and implanted seed marker prostate localization methods: Implications for image-guided radiotherapy.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE
To analyze two methods of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for external beam radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
The prostate was localized by ultrasound (US) in lateral (left/right), vertical (anteroposterior), and longitudinal (superior/inferior) dimensions and then by fiducial seed marker (SM) kV X-ray. Assuming initial setup to skin marks as the origin, the mean suggested shifts (for all dimensions) were hypothesized to be similar and within 1 mm of the origin. The three-dimensional distance discrepancy between suggested SM and US shift points was calculated. We hypothesized a mean discrepancy >5 mm as clinically significant.
RESULTS
From 40 patients, 1019 US/SM measurements were obtained. Lateral, vertical, and longitudinal dimensional comparisons reveal statistically significant differences in mean shifts (p < 0.0001 for all). US dimensional shifts reveal significantly greater variability. The US three-dimensional vector is greater and more variable than the SM vector (p < 0.0001). The mean US/SM three-dimensional distance discrepancy is 8.8 mm (significantly >5 mm, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS
Ultrasound and SM methods suggest different shifts. US data reveal greater systematic/random error vs. SM data. The US data suggest larger PTV expansion margins (approximately 9 mm) are necessary for US IGRT vs. SM IGRT (approximately 3 mm). The hypotheses that US and SM methods suggest similar shifts and that the mean US/SM three-dimensional distance discrepancy is < or =5 mm are rejected.
Related Questions
New answer by Radiation Oncologist at Northeast Alabama Regional Medical Center (April 1, 2017)
IGRT questions are, to me, the most mathematically interesting questions in radiation oncology and relatively understudied. They involve things like systematic error, random e...
Standard RTOG constraints include guidelines for rectal v60, v65, v70, v75, but is there a relative or absolute volume constraint for rectal v80 that ...
New answer by Radiation Oncologist at Northeast Alabama Regional Medical Center (April 21, 2017)
For many, many years I have treated the prostate (CTV) to a minimum dose of 81 Gy based on MSKCC data that was initially appearing in the late 90's (3DCRT data) and refined/up...
If so, how should one approach it?
New comment by ( June 21, 2019)
I favor the use of fiducial seeds if possible since the therapists find these an easier way to verify field placement over CBCT when both methods are used for field confirmati...