Rheumatology (Oxford, England) 2011-12
Peripheral neuropathy in ANCA-associated vasculitis: outcomes from the European Vasculitis Study Group trials.   
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES
To describe the incidence and prevalence of peripheral neuropathy in ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV); to evaluate the correlation of neuropathy with other clinical manifestations; and to review the long-term outcome of treated neuropathy.
METHODS
Presence of neuropathy was determined using items from the BVAS and vasculitis damage index (VDI) during 5 years from enrollment into clinical trials conducted by the European Vasculitis Study Group (EUVAS).
RESULTS
Forty (8%) of 506 patients had vasculitic neuropathy at baseline. Incidence of vasculitic motor-involving neuropathy was identical between microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) [16 (7%) out of 237] and granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's) [19 (7%) out of 269], P = 0.94. Pure sensory neuropathy was reported in 5 (2%) out of 269 patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis, but not in patients with MPA, P = 0.065. Vasculitic neuropathy at baseline was associated with systemic [odds ratio (OR) = 1.81], cutaneous (OR = 1.29), mucous membranes (OR = 1.21) and ENT (OR = 1.14) manifestations of vasculitis (P < 0.05 for all). There was no association between neuropathy and renal, chest, cardiovascular or abdominal vasculitis or with overall mortality. Of the 40 patients with vasculitic neuropathy at baseline, 35% had complete resolution within 6 months. The cumulative prevalence of chronic neuropathy at any time up to 5 years was 15% (75 of 506). Chronic neuropathy was associated with older age [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.03], higher BVAS (HR = 1.07) and lower baseline creatinine (HR = 0.82) (P < 0.01 for all).
CONCLUSION
Peripheral neuropathy is an occasional accompaniment of AAV that typically remits in concert with non-neuropathic manifestations, usually involves motor nerves, often produces long-lasting symptoms and is not associated with life-threatening organ involvement.

Related Questions

How would you label such a patient?  Would you treat differently if they have poor functional status?