Would you consider a trial of pembrolizumab in a patient with metastatic urothelial carcinoma progressing on atezolizumab?
Given the apparently stronger results from KEYNOTE 052 (pembrolizumab) compared to IMvigor 211 (atezolizumab), would you consider pembrolizumab for patients progressing on atezolizumab?
Answer from: Medical Oncologist at Academic Institution
I dont think that would make sense. The monotherapy data for all the CPI are very similar. IMvigor 211 was a negative trial purely on a "trial design" issue. The ITT population was positive favoring atezolizumab over chemotherapy. I would consider a CPI after a trial of chemotherapy or radiation whi...
Comments
Medical Oncologist at University of Washington School of Medicine Agree that we have no data to try another CPI afte...
Answer from: Medical Oncologist at Academic Institution
Agree with @Sandy Srinivas on approach, however, there may be some theoretical advantage (as yet to be clinically proven) of using an anti-PD1 over anti-PD-L1, as there could be suppression mediated through PD-1 via expression of PD-L2 in the TME (reviewed: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jir/...
Agree that we have no data to try another CPI afte...