Would you consider giving thrombolytic therapy for patients with acute vision loss concerning for CRAO based on history and within the window before any ophthalmological assessment and confirmation?
Would your approach differ through telemedicine for small ERs without access to onsite ophthalmology or neurology?
Answer from: at Academic Institution
We have utilized a prior study to give tPA or tenecteplase within 4.5 hours of onset for CRAO. I would not do so, however, without an ophthalmology evaluation to confirm the likely diagnosis and to exclude an alternative diagnosis such as a retinal detachment.
Comments
at The University of Tennessee Medical Center I agree with Dr. @Kirshner's approach. First, do n...
This is a comment for the author of this question. The answer is a matter of general principles of medical practice: when a patient presents with a serious or life-threatening new neurological or other symptom in an ED, which has a differential diagnosis including at least 2 diagnoses that are treat...
Comments
at Hendricks Neurology Agree with you, but now many ERs use tele-neurolog...
Vitreous and retinal hemorrhage and detachment (and other thrombolytic contraindications) should be excluded first because thrombolytics would end up causing harm in those situations. If ophthalmology is not available, ultrasound (available in the ED) can be used to detachment. Also, dilation of the...
I agree with Dr. @Kirshner's approach. First, do n...