How do you determine your treatment volumes when treating with chemoradiation for bladder cancer?
Do you routinely include pelvic lymph nodes, prostatic urethra, and prostate?
Answer from: Radiation Oncologist at Academic Institution
Good question! The fields for bladder preservation with chemoradiation have not been standardized, and there are multiple reasonable options based on trials/experiences for certain fields. In general, it is important to try to minimize dose of RT to adjacent tissues that are more sensitive. Because ...
Comments
Radiation Oncologist at Lake Huron Medical Center No more inclusion of prostate / SV? That's probabl...
Radiation Oncologist at Providence Health, St. Joseph Hospital For years, I got absolutely no referrals for bladd...
Radiation Oncologist at The Toledo Clinic This recently engendered lively discussion in our ...
Radiation Oncologist at Sutter Medcl Center To @Simul Parikh's question, FWIW, at least per SW...
Radiation Oncologist at UC San Diego Is the goal of covering the prostate with the smal...
Answer from: Radiation Oncologist at Community Practice
I have found that I can do a partial bladder boost most effectively by starting with the boost, when it is easiest for patients to maintain full bladder.
Answer from: Radiation Oncologist at Academic Institution
It is a great and difficult question, as evidenced by the SWOG trial @Sophia C. Kamran referenced. Perhaps the strongest evidence for concurrent chemotherapy comes from BC2001 (James et al. NEJM 2012), which showed a DFS benefit (and trend for OS). The protocol for that study describes 3D ...
Answer from: Radiation Oncologist at Academic Institution
In my opinion, the most troubling organ in this situation is the small bowel. To my knowledge, there is no data on small bowel dose, nor have I ever seen it addressed in any bladder protocol. Yet, treating the bladder to full dose (either 55 Gy in 20 or conventional 64 Gy) would eclipse what we trad...
Comments
Radiation Oncologist I have referenced this article in particular ...
Radiation Oncologist at University of Pittsburgh Hi @Matthew J. Boyer. Thank you for the article. Y...
Radiation Oncologist at UC San Diego I share your concern. I take solace in the data fr...
Answer from: Radiation Oncologist at Community Practice
We believe that being able to reduce off some of the bladder reduces toxicity, although acknowledge that data are lacking. Knowing where to boost (identifying the reduction target) is often a challenge and we discuss each case and review films with our urologists. We have discussed placing markers o...
No more inclusion of prostate / SV? That's probabl...
For years, I got absolutely no referrals for bladd...
This recently engendered lively discussion in our ...
To @Simul Parikh's question, FWIW, at least per SW...
Is the goal of covering the prostate with the smal...