In light of the NSABP B-51 data presented at SABCS, will you defer RNI in all patients with negative nodes after chemotherapy?
Are there any subgroups that would still benefit from RNI?
Answer from: Radiation Oncologist at Academic Institution
Results of the NSABP B-51 trial were presented at the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (Mamounas et al., abstract GS-02-07). This trial was designed to test the value of postoperative radiation therapy in patients who presented with clinical T1-3N1 tumors with biopsy-proven axillary node inv...
Comments
Radiation Oncologist at Mitchell Cancer Institute My thoughts exactly! But far more elegantly stated...
Radiation Oncologist at Northside Hospital This is a very important trial in the era of de-es...
Radiation Oncologist at Weill Cornell Medical College I agree with Dr. @Recht.
Thank you
Answer from: Radiation Oncologist at Academic Institution
B51 has the potential to be a practice-changing trial! I agree with much of what Dr. @Recht writes in his thoughtful summary and commentary.To briefly summarize eligibility, the trial enrolled women with clinically node-positive disease (cT1-3 N1), who received NAC and had a pathologic complete...
Comments
Radiation Oncologist at Community Health Network Thank you for the wonderful summary and analysis.
Radiation Oncologist at Columbia University Medical Center/ New York Presbyterian / Hudson Valley Hospital I agree. Thank you so much!
Radiation Oncologist at Northside Hospital This was a great summary of the data by Dr. @Gerbe...
Answer from: Radiation Oncologist at Community Practice
For stage II patients with pCR in the node, I recommended pMRT or RNI specifically for triple-negative cases. In stage III (T3N1) scenarios with pCR, I recommend pMRT or RNI to all patients. Given this data, I'll need to reassess the standard treatment for these two subsets.
It's worth noting that ...
Comments
Radiation Oncologist at Stroger Hospital If there is a CR, I see no purpose of PM RT unless...
Radiation Oncologist at Pikeville Medical Center Meanwhile, are you still treating those subgroups?...
Radiation Oncologist at Varian Medical Systems/Allegheny health network T4 and N2 were not included in B-51 and for these ...
Answer from: Radiation Oncologist at Academic Institution
Dr. @Recht's and @Gerber's write-ups above are noteworthy and thoughtful. As Dr. @Gerber notes, the majority of patients here (80%) had pathCR in the breast and nodes, suggesting that practitioners were preferentially enrolling patients they felt were at very low risk of RT omission. The inclusion o...
Comments
Radiation Oncologist at Indiana University Health @Atif J. Khan @Naamit K. Gerber @Abram Recht @Sush...
Radiation Oncologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Not yet any that I am aware of.
Radiation Oncologist at Indiana University Health Is there an estimated timeframe that a manuscript ...
Radiation Oncologist at Kaiser Permanente Is there any data regarding the number of patients...
Radiation Oncologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Nothing presented at the meeting about this, and n...
Radiation Oncologist at Varian Medical Systems/Allegheny health network This is the largest series for n (ITC) who did not...
Radiation Oncologist at MultiCare Deaconess Hospital Such a helpful discussion - thank you! Some of the...
My thoughts exactly! But far more elegantly stated...
This is a very important trial in the era of de-es...
I agree with Dr. @Recht. Thank you